{"id":"W1995747895","doi":"10.1002/cyto.10090","title":"Evaluation of stabilized blood cell products as candidate preparations for quality assessment programs for CD4 T‐cell counting","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cytometry","topic":"Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control","field":"Medicine","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Health Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Flow cytometry; Cell counting; Enumeration; Coefficient of variation; Cell; Quality assessment; Cytometry; Chromatography; Immunology; Andrology; Molecular biology; Chemistry; Biology; Mathematics; Medicine; External quality assessment; Cell cycle; Pathology; Biochemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008500909,0.0001547016,0.0004974197,0.00009516568,0.000119307,0.00004792476,0.00008866363,0.0001192105,0.0001887364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006759879,0.0001339632,0.0001612504,0.0004805998,0.00005503487,0.0001852639,0.00002186839,0.0001496513,0.000006945619],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001056379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005155226,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003210782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002465094,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973071,0.0003626585,0.0008750454,0.0004316877,0.0007587392,0.0002647579],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943194,0.001402934,0.0007050557,0.0005246886,0.00293166,0.0001162947],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004364632,0.04359015,0.09248525,0.01555775,0.002316861,0.00000400256,0.004399315,0.0001594994,0.6989131,0.0026521,0.008610673,0.1269466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.1381564,0.01536987,0.02560511,0.000597288,0.02373509,0.00001403911,0.005819516,0.1687883,0.4103264,0.002799769,0.2067574,0.002030857],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9879121,0.0009570575,0.001336384,0.001301999,0.0002019004,0.005711682,0.0002055764,0.00005240693,0.002320879],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900129,0.00002886388,0.007987574,0.0002057853,0.0002259314,0.000726564,0.0002193235,0.00002444725,0.0005685599],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2885868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8092695,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2248752533570682,"score_gpt":0.4789052842434571,"score_spread":0.2540300308863889,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}