{"id":"W1995747895","doi":"10.1002/cyto.10090","title":"Evaluation of stabilized blood cell products as candidate preparations for quality assessment programs for CD4 T‐cell counting","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cytometry","topic":"Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control","field":"Medicine","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Health Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Flow cytometry; Cell counting; Enumeration; Coefficient of variation; Cell; Quality assessment; Cytometry; Chromatography; Immunology; Andrology; Molecular biology; Chemistry; Biology; Mathematics; Medicine; External quality assessment; Cell cycle; Pathology; Biochemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004223343,0.0006360078,0.0002607915,0.0004586748,0.0004343555,0.0009400052,0.0006943428,0.0006112325,0.001520507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006810282,0.0002249262,0.0002885952,0.0004220087,0.0005099329,0.0003477169,0.0003684755,0.0003611794,0.0004431792],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000388605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000434,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004903526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004707678,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976702,0.001012661,0.0002780993,0.0003504122,0.00061147,0.00007717164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965926,0.0009802396,0.000661541,0.0004497742,0.001205237,0.0001106142],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001827071,0.0002982781,0.01219491,0.0002065714,0.00007746575,0.0001142786,0.0003555653,0.001279428,0.9546098,0.0003292494,0.0003479409,0.02835949],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009486033,0.004629073,0.009949539,0.00004361759,0.0001949398,0.0004976463,0.0001150845,0.002418684,0.9785624,0.0001089712,0.003366379,0.00001882566],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9643086,0.001800929,0.03188302,0.0001889272,0.00005629924,0.0004853152,0.0003697009,0.0001657073,0.0007416115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9193773,0.0008078156,0.07640963,0.0001043084,0.00004761762,0.000403938,0.001902444,0.00007160068,0.0008754592],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004223343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02233547,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2248752533570682,"score_gpt":0.4789052842434571,"score_spread":0.2540300308863889,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}