{"id":"W1995769095","doi":"10.1109/tit.2012.2191663","title":"On the Optimum Diversity–Multiplexing Tradeoff of the Two-User Gaussian Interference Channel With Rayleigh Fading","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Information Theory","topic":"Cooperative Communication and Network Coding","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Rayleigh fading; Fading; Channel state information; Multiplexing; Computer science; Gaussian; Algorithm; Diversity gain; Code rate; Channel (broadcasting); Electronic engineering; Topology (electrical circuits); Mathematics; Telecommunications; Decoding methods; Wireless; Physics; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003081044,0.001496324,0.00101907,0.0009252469,0.0008624857,0.002281588,0.000807319,0.001173073,0.001505204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01153164,0.0005761404,0.0003357638,0.001210168,0.002186208,0.002762961,0.001651541,0.0009906617,0.0003036617],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001884269,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008517291,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001309341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00110051,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978979,0.001071706,0.00004448151,0.0001881745,0.0004265233,0.0003713107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944773,0.004475348,0.0003209281,0.0002341114,0.0003574828,0.0001349233],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005653026,0.0000710004,0.001130362,0.000266702,0.00006782476,0.000501877,0.0003527931,0.6541321,0.01499524,0.2960381,0.001259251,0.03061946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003777192,0.0001721384,0.0005060684,0.00007297688,0.00003456461,0.0004195991,0.0001209575,0.9022176,0.004346717,0.09100204,0.001004371,0.00006513306],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2562167,0.006726937,0.6983202,0.001420584,0.000112466,0.00007811511,0.0001544776,0.0001573541,0.03681311],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9774506,0.002179128,0.0189756,0.0001451566,0.0001240663,0.00004531742,0.0000303104,0.00003472109,0.001015164],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003081044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0162943,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02981499290483446,"score_gpt":0.235826853258566,"score_spread":0.2060118603537315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}