{"id":"W1995833285","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.03.042","title":"Framing community forestry challenges with a broader lens: Case studies from the Brazilian Amazon","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Management","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Umweltbundesamt; International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Operationalization; Framing (construction); Business; Community forestry; Amazon rainforest; Sustainability; Community management; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Permission; Forest management; Public relations; Political science; Forestry; Geography; Ecology; Economics; Management","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00689439,0.0004630439,0.0004699138,0.001471256,0.01829855,0.007876711,0.002446113,0.004857821,0.004770862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01229901,0.0003422342,0.0002889704,0.002893728,0.01149679,0.005377108,0.007348577,0.003542812,0.000170644],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01022484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01184244,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1091089,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3600185,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9936127,0.004303192,0.0001078007,0.0002253811,0.0004854035,0.001265578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9888757,0.007634242,0.0009218375,0.0003893251,0.0008858211,0.001293074],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005487401,0.000461245,0.02917469,0.0004268422,0.0000365239,0.01145709,0.7720321,0.001200836,0.001194081,0.131672,0.00597564,0.04631411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001005793,0.00003748953,0.00764754,0.0003620544,0.00001677686,0.001060054,0.9420107,0.0005348189,0.0001381046,0.01326026,0.03490779,0.00001438188],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8776422,0.002463147,0.002920571,0.03688516,0.00008889779,0.0001464599,0.00005417422,0.00001398311,0.07978545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964067,0.0006948941,0.0008882031,0.0006913059,0.00001375448,0.0000323476,0.00000962752,0.000006589511,0.00125646],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1091089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2169476,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05906734919687594,"score_gpt":0.2170772303733265,"score_spread":0.1580098811764506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}