{"id":"W1995865385","doi":"10.1155/2012/478728","title":"The Weighted Gini-Simpson Index: Revitalizing an Old Index of Biodiversity","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Ecology","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Biodiversity; Diversity index; Index (typography); Abundance (ecology); Relative species abundance; Phylogenetic diversity; Species diversity; Multiplicative function; Distribution (mathematics); Gini coefficient; Statistics; Ecology; Biology; Species richness; Mathematics; Phylogenetic tree; Inequality; Computer science; Economic inequality","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003574122,0.00005356268,0.0001187678,0.00001740138,0.0001100058,0.00001735371,0.0003543502,0.00004801575,0.0001140284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007177285,0.00001776624,0.00007175524,0.00005640618,0.00006922794,0.0001900818,0.00008175558,0.00009793747,0.000007127909],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000270884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005514639,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006664785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008007665,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99937,0.00005605883,0.000214638,0.00004711621,0.0001782847,0.0001338811],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991727,0.0002437712,0.0002986905,0.000009780784,0.0002243225,0.00005074562],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001183741,0.00008569556,0.9839633,5.927812e-7,0.00007954903,0.000006792337,0.00007618306,8.497814e-7,0.007167489,0.0006137917,0.001169428,0.006717944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001238322,0.0002031747,0.9773563,0.000007422789,0.000008259172,0.00005106426,0.0002895666,0.00001248971,0.0003379109,0.0005241253,0.02104506,0.00004078443],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9965731,0.0002828286,0.000001613682,0.002126065,0.0005031307,0.00002362583,0.00001966958,0.000003392208,0.0004665904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989943,0.0002811229,0.00001253986,0.0001931452,0.0004752157,3.106971e-7,0.000003092826,1.961496e-7,0.00004007474],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01987563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1248531,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04382024040122585,"score_gpt":0.2478785897124352,"score_spread":0.2040583493112094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}