{"id":"W1995865385","doi":"10.1155/2012/478728","title":"The Weighted Gini-Simpson Index: Revitalizing an Old Index of Biodiversity","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Ecology","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Biodiversity; Diversity index; Index (typography); Abundance (ecology); Relative species abundance; Phylogenetic diversity; Species diversity; Multiplicative function; Distribution (mathematics); Gini coefficient; Statistics; Ecology; Biology; Species richness; Mathematics; Phylogenetic tree; Inequality; Computer science; Economic inequality","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005255577,0.00111242,0.001369723,0.008803775,0.001136654,0.004258004,0.001867367,0.001184908,0.001238872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01809515,0.0003722191,0.0009727765,0.01111011,0.003592264,0.006888323,0.003285701,0.002185346,0.0005376962],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002658532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001773338,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004380105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003236517,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9954875,0.001087486,0.0004011992,0.0009094711,0.001933354,0.000180849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922632,0.00359749,0.001087388,0.000783106,0.001820361,0.0004484231],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001287229,0.00004957403,0.02725966,0.0007444218,0.00042251,0.0003999725,0.001348798,0.03369141,0.003961961,0.5596802,0.01526582,0.3570469],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001914523,0.0001525607,0.02076825,0.0002780503,0.0001209133,0.001583793,0.0006228784,0.1168935,0.00262976,0.7235472,0.1331451,0.0002389021],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.04022009,0.01339756,0.9176524,0.002067047,0.00143545,0.0001306974,0.001238437,0.0003639402,0.02349453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4553077,0.01176214,0.5201218,0.0007381343,0.002579856,0.0003080251,0.001839161,0.0006092631,0.006733919],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008803775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02779448,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04382024040122585,"score_gpt":0.2478785897124352,"score_spread":0.2040583493112094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}