{"id":"W1995872983","doi":"10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.11.001","title":"Methods for inclusion: Employing think aloud protocols in software usability studies with individuals who are deaf","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Human-Computer Studies","topic":"Hearing Impairment and Communication","field":"Psychology","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Usability; Cognitive walkthrough; Think aloud protocol; Computer science; Software walkthrough; Protocol (science); Inclusion (mineral); Human–computer interaction; Gesture; Usability inspection; Usability lab; Protocol analysis; Pluralistic walkthrough; Multimedia; Software; Psychology; Usability engineering; Software development; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002739536,0.0002185833,0.0006254418,0.0003195807,0.0003480795,0.00007180529,0.000905249,0.00006927278,0.00002094515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003135711,0.0001620048,0.0001459556,0.0001155353,0.0001585519,0.0003634412,0.001020766,0.0003406401,0.000003710916],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003456803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004488917,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008825848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008562105,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976531,0.0004672706,0.0009482533,0.000251609,0.0004383065,0.0002414677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996499,0.001173073,0.0007726534,0.0002969015,0.001210925,0.00004744815],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006296795,0.001572217,0.3112099,0.0001711526,0.00563969,0.0000559206,0.2707274,0.000665608,0.00004736954,0.002495053,0.01025294,0.3965331],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01582842,0.004993455,0.8434126,0.00749578,0.0002765747,0.0003936674,0.02898315,0.0003685584,0.000685327,0.04338313,0.05294443,0.001234871],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9317841,0.006281435,0.04632888,0.009664637,0.001141393,0.004583205,0.000009105169,0.00007853938,0.0001287217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5866976,0.0001436483,0.4081334,0.001389915,0.002026944,0.001285649,0.000004663144,0.00004368973,0.0002744375],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5322027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6606363,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1892601943180626,"score_gpt":0.544539705143206,"score_spread":0.3552795108251434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}