{"id":"W1995922497","doi":"10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.06.006","title":"Assessing forest soil base cation status and availability using lake and stream sediment geochemistry: A case study in Quebec (Canada)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Geoderma","topic":"Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue; Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"Canadian Forest Service; Consortium of International Agricultural Research Centers; Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies","keywords":"Sediment; Geology; Hydrology (agriculture); Geochemistry; Forestry; Environmental science; Earth science; Geomorphology; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000260588,0.0001622195,0.000164799,0.00003125751,0.0001823278,0.0003369896,0.0001248112,0.00005783792,0.00003384607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009508778,0.0001606351,0.00001157448,0.0001509499,0.00005634399,0.0005831512,0.0002715118,0.0001428405,5.728484e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001116087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003898119,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7924173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9338924,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986408,0.00007542726,0.0002498362,0.0004837659,0.0001895851,0.000360529],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991617,0.00009443364,0.00009688886,0.0003868138,0.0001048431,0.0001553826],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002992313,0.0002570681,0.9791626,0.0001499929,0.00001763381,0.0009336681,0.002240055,0.001634574,0.002355772,0.00001905347,0.00018477,0.0130418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001234537,0.00003692587,0.5043522,0.00006108758,0.00002070519,0.0006952455,0.01055425,0.4787169,0.002640438,0.0008859653,0.0002917214,0.0005100352],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9978808,0.00005754379,0.000680422,0.0006594721,0.00004298699,0.0002885987,0.000002259782,0.00002990364,0.0003580058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985731,0.000001513104,0.001126048,0.0000817433,0.00002029481,0.00002676532,0.000007051941,0.000002482177,0.0001610332],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4770823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6550508,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02036447482475807,"score_gpt":0.2441752112754654,"score_spread":0.2238107364507074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}