{"id":"W1995922497","doi":"10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.06.006","title":"Assessing forest soil base cation status and availability using lake and stream sediment geochemistry: A case study in Quebec (Canada)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Geoderma","topic":"Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue; Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"Canadian Forest Service; Consortium of International Agricultural Research Centers; Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies","keywords":"Sediment; Geology; Hydrology (agriculture); Geochemistry; Forestry; Environmental science; Earth science; Geomorphology; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005459529,0.0004651177,0.0003654334,0.0009492054,0.002845508,0.001470426,0.001147148,0.000804012,0.001238043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001243007,0.0002766623,0.0003256941,0.003208544,0.0008237918,0.0004662963,0.0005090602,0.0005599198,0.0001793517],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02872219,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01884288,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9978698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9992561,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995901,0.00005640755,0.00001649076,0.00006607062,0.0001277325,0.0001432045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989105,0.0001521818,0.0001083898,0.00002981875,0.000611074,0.0001880112],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004366798,0.0004470775,0.9212639,0.0001781628,0.0002227733,0.002664897,0.004734669,0.007952234,0.005058164,0.0006577131,0.00431133,0.05207238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005402905,0.000127881,0.9737008,0.00005435537,0.00009825679,0.0002324624,0.008408823,0.0118007,0.001011675,0.000123194,0.004344552,0.00004313458],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9948372,0.0002936769,0.0004619086,0.000297038,0.000004441104,0.00008308656,0.001298782,0.0000321622,0.002691678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942108,0.0002543032,0.001750503,0.0000979387,0.000002311827,0.00002010953,0.0006300812,0.00001009138,0.003023769],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02872219,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.208395,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02036447482475807,"score_gpt":0.2441752112754654,"score_spread":0.2238107364507074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}