{"id":"W1995926946","doi":"10.2495/sdp-v9-n1-90-105","title":"Assessing the future potential of waste flows – case study scrap tires","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Scrap; Resource (disambiguation); Material efficiency; Life-cycle assessment; Quality (philosophy); Process (computing); Product (mathematics); Environmental science; Materials processing; Environmental economics; Resource depletion; Risk analysis (engineering); Computer science; Waste management; Engineering; Process engineering; Production (economics); Business; Mechanical engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001279552,0.001150019,0.000740501,0.001767751,0.0007836878,0.001793386,0.001134131,0.003192533,0.002907725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001603683,0.0004685562,0.001645779,0.001972617,0.0006469119,0.001430628,0.00076636,0.000939597,0.00036888],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001884492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008172375,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02359967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01754994,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995517,0.0001474501,0.00002688702,0.00006079864,0.0001032009,0.0001098476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998418,0.001093659,0.000113954,0.00008909776,0.0001902094,0.00009518559],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001765314,0.0002048708,0.008453001,0.0001966683,0.00005329777,0.003516652,0.0001571681,0.9756757,0.00214918,0.001676735,0.0004910751,0.007249153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006889507,0.0003656762,0.007358885,0.00006855431,0.00008826709,0.000544093,0.001297756,0.9746584,0.009446243,0.002881653,0.003143059,0.00007857813],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9821928,0.0003711425,0.008253579,0.0002059609,0.00001836612,0.000146211,0.001041065,0.0001147662,0.007656038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.987852,0.0004333393,0.006977059,0.00001827063,0.00001080175,0.0000922011,0.0005098523,0.0000341843,0.004072348],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02359967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04692459,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009516256442498877,"score_gpt":0.2750194742938071,"score_spread":0.2655032178513083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}