{"id":"W1995928771","doi":"10.2495/sdp-v9-n2-277-300","title":"Preserving, reconstructing and enhancing the place identity: identifying principles of urban sustainability with placemaker method","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning","topic":"Urban Planning and Valuation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainability; Identity (music); Place identity; Environmental planning; Urban sustainability; Architectural engineering; Urban planning; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Environmental resource management; Aesthetics; Civil engineering; Engineering; Geography; Environmental science; Art; Philosophy; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01617993,0.000622541,0.0007299446,0.002449225,0.002857053,0.006934168,0.001946692,0.001979258,0.004209795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009286951,0.0004602855,0.0006653189,0.00165012,0.02457276,0.008270022,0.008011232,0.002324496,0.0005651828],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00264075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003155312,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005255979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001618423,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9877735,0.009081841,0.0002473972,0.0006638095,0.001933432,0.0002999891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938099,0.004062316,0.0002805906,0.001242311,0.0004659547,0.0001390498],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005585205,0.0001013049,0.001168941,0.0003894789,0.0000194719,0.000160953,0.03537064,0.001739685,0.001964939,0.8778421,0.0008570387,0.08032955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006162124,0.0003212012,0.001801593,0.0005621455,0.00005761452,0.0006358444,0.04210502,0.009491192,0.01086352,0.795635,0.1383705,0.00009472459],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06102096,0.0009625714,0.8232318,0.003119978,0.0001466213,0.0007224241,0.00004387739,0.0002481004,0.1105038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5017154,0.000747467,0.4785326,0.0003355662,0.00002570328,0.001013428,0.00003951876,0.0001507695,0.0174395],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01617993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08556867,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0229455336791303,"score_gpt":0.2898918833178837,"score_spread":0.2669463496387534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}