{"id":"W1996010464","doi":"10.1002/spe.440","title":"Taming access control security: extending capabilities using the views relationship","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Software Practice and Experience","topic":"Security and Verification in Computing","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro; University of Waterloo","keywords":"Abstraction; Computer science; Access control; Object (grammar); Domain (mathematical analysis); Computer security model; Control (management); Role-based access control; Security policy; Order (exchange); Computer security; Interface (matter); Distributed computing; Operating system; Artificial intelligence; Business","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006555725,0.0005713176,0.0004406449,0.0009826532,0.0008773361,0.004214721,0.00132078,0.001336257,0.001658289],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01202475,0.0006807743,0.001138381,0.000609307,0.005719431,0.01301124,0.005791243,0.003464888,0.0003180957],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009005123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001385596,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001482496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008672407,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99245,0.0042057,0.0004274427,0.0004944417,0.0018823,0.0005400814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9802927,0.01049353,0.00147636,0.006022762,0.001121021,0.0005935834],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008792725,0.00007031571,0.001867389,0.00009719896,0.00005212996,0.0006452122,0.002379515,0.009812674,0.009320077,0.9289007,0.0009780793,0.04578871],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001048577,0.0003891723,0.0008703743,0.0003691336,0.0002243122,0.001755614,0.001312993,0.1352524,0.04415408,0.736433,0.07899561,0.0001384426],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07187255,0.0007546735,0.9081844,0.00154733,0.00009819007,0.00006486379,0.00002515801,0.001116396,0.01633644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8643766,0.0008303234,0.1320376,0.000376584,0.0001015147,0.00009440052,0.00003598257,0.0002355627,0.001911457],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006555725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03467035,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1084530335172283,"score_gpt":0.3575995005652543,"score_spread":0.249146467048026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}