{"id":"W1996036854","doi":"10.1142/s0218194000000079","title":"AN APPROACH TO QUANTITATIVE SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURE SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering","topic":"Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Nortel (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Reference architecture; Computer science; Architecture tradeoff analysis method; Software architecture description; Robustness (evolution); Software architecture; Resource-oriented architecture; Software engineering; Software; Software construction; Software sizing; Software system; Data mining; Operating system","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01969109,0.00268338,0.00138818,0.0103394,0.001156386,0.004944893,0.002655526,0.001888685,0.005587593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06303839,0.001132158,0.002429582,0.006171035,0.004259201,0.004752337,0.003836265,0.004298206,0.0006165037],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003096366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002353128,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001538657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007999502,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9761102,0.0132807,0.001171478,0.001577927,0.007384561,0.0004751175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9564355,0.03218997,0.002684026,0.004444022,0.003971081,0.000275339],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004181834,0.0001915582,0.001183964,0.0004834066,0.0002247023,0.000150355,0.0009760623,0.1336148,0.004822511,0.7800599,0.001592498,0.07665848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002042377,0.0001197224,0.0007056421,0.0001457612,0.00004958711,0.0001431662,0.0003390184,0.2315868,0.002823612,0.7532775,0.0107043,0.00008451533],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.001895655,0.0001473179,0.9921871,0.0002284818,0.00003258856,0.0001892056,0.00009573031,0.0001931034,0.005030699],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.196023,0.0004193649,0.7982095,0.0003278206,0.0001362304,0.002298249,0.0002590073,0.000255454,0.002071295],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01969109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1041377,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0172323464908005,"score_gpt":0.2860545654346823,"score_spread":0.2688222189438818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}