{"id":"W1996120796","doi":"10.1080/10572250802437382","title":"Public Communication of Climate Change Science: Engaging Citizens Through Apocalyptic Narrative Explanation","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Technical Communication Quarterly","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Pathos; Persuasion; Ethos; Narrative; Premise; Logos Bible Software; Science communication; Rhetorical question; Rationality; Sociology; Fluency; Public relations; Climate change; Political science; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Science education; Social psychology; Psychology; Computer science; Pedagogy; Law; Ecology; Linguistics; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01573091,0.0005512231,0.0003475508,0.001148332,0.005341297,0.008932377,0.001355613,0.004649667,0.004868355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04319834,0.0003761397,0.0004166529,0.001015518,0.02202004,0.01455521,0.009026385,0.005023233,0.0005862081],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003204345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003338923,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001393337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007591948,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9830849,0.0143025,0.0003032738,0.0004642309,0.00120082,0.0006443004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.957593,0.0347643,0.003000293,0.002662488,0.00140844,0.0005715022],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009626184,0.00008381162,0.001394909,0.0001242028,0.00001375939,0.0005098801,0.3240832,0.0007586126,0.0007100939,0.6538322,0.003748075,0.01464506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001082666,0.00008926399,0.0007989384,0.0003613001,0.00003498803,0.0005150022,0.1655551,0.007020913,0.002654876,0.6893658,0.1334439,0.00005169831],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3992865,0.00140471,0.1670573,0.1388041,0.000727703,0.0002019682,0.0001194113,0.0003100618,0.2920882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922541,0.0002040825,0.004337746,0.001006779,0.00005849571,0.00005518366,0.0000224307,0.00003416851,0.002026921],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01573091,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08319396,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.560785135857386,"score_gpt":0.4528605149621346,"score_spread":0.1079246208952513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}