{"id":"W1996123109","doi":"10.1002/cjce.20051","title":"Assessment of cleaner process options: A case study from petroleum refining","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council","keywords":"Process (computing); Hazardous waste; Refinery; Oil refinery; Life-cycle assessment; Refining (metallurgy); Computer science; Environmental impact assessment; Risk analysis (engineering); Cleaner production; Process engineering; Environmental science; Waste management; Engineering; Municipal solid waste; Production (economics); Business","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003529558,0.0006720278,0.0005654179,0.001709409,0.003023593,0.001860149,0.001779315,0.00319644,0.003904152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009216143,0.0004167244,0.0006570873,0.00229764,0.001420233,0.001691679,0.001365175,0.001484886,0.0003768302],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003564612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002104236,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03661171,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0850285,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997009,0.001667367,0.0001050082,0.0001363329,0.0008156574,0.0002666366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9870096,0.0100724,0.0004611335,0.0005628946,0.001477262,0.0004167089],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003606719,0.01248884,0.1018428,0.002913737,0.0004693536,0.07494754,0.03393733,0.467216,0.0417066,0.04147509,0.009548339,0.2098476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001881222,0.009766105,0.06454638,0.0005378409,0.0005707553,0.01327015,0.1292129,0.5077103,0.1400656,0.02815756,0.103656,0.0006251476],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9845484,0.0001166449,0.00648951,0.0005415344,0.000008784444,0.0003782564,0.0003087073,0.00004046509,0.007567553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9759236,0.0003203077,0.01952115,0.00008505137,0.000008174649,0.0001408493,0.0002302444,0.00002829286,0.003742358],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03661171,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07279718,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01173895551590025,"score_gpt":0.2388075507681608,"score_spread":0.2270685952522606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}