{"id":"W1996131030","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2125.2004.2092.x","title":"Determining the reporting quality of RCTs in clinical pharmacology","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; University of Toronto; McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Blinding; Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials; Medicine; Clinical trial; Randomization; Randomized controlled trial; Adverse effect; Alternative medicine; Informed consent; Research design; Clinical study design; Confidence interval; Clinical pharmacology; Family medicine; Pharmacology; Internal medicine; Pathology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.5421937,0.0002429831,0.008343472,0.0002674382,0.0001203739,0.0001613978,0.002717327,0.0003123505,0.003993042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3402359,0.000136666,0.004936497,0.0009320953,0.0006732523,0.0003054866,0.0003037041,0.001925898,0.0001199751],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000420738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006897248,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003147208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009035647,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8463761,0.05125184,0.09779189,0.0008271962,0.003282069,0.0004709485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7930973,0.06900079,0.1315039,0.00122716,0.004600591,0.0005702729],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002263741,0.001372409,0.7021379,0.00004706919,0.0007380273,0.001131709,0.0001256549,0.0009887662,0.0003022574,0.00006905308,0.08692872,0.205932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005757989,0.0004103526,0.9618341,0.0001093286,0.0005022695,0.0008315246,0.0001855871,0.0002868417,0.00009595842,0.00408869,0.02572624,0.0001711647],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9856508,0.001022383,0.001195339,0.003134951,0.00749869,0.0004365622,0.000006053632,0.00000246111,0.001052779],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897965,0.0006727631,0.002554933,0.004678945,0.00207774,0.000006597166,7.448528e-7,0.00001325276,0.0001985797],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2596961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969174,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9096875503295264,"score_gpt":0.7236526451516111,"score_spread":0.1860349051779153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}