{"id":"W1996131030","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2125.2004.2092.x","title":"Determining the reporting quality of RCTs in clinical pharmacology","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; University of Toronto; McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Blinding; Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials; Medicine; Clinical trial; Randomization; Randomized controlled trial; Adverse effect; Alternative medicine; Informed consent; Research design; Clinical study design; Confidence interval; Clinical pharmacology; Family medicine; Pharmacology; Internal medicine; Pathology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.813534,0.002757215,0.01061088,0.02762753,0.003273743,0.01035137,0.006446673,0.007705234,0.004110747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.923758,0.003049217,0.01519981,0.02679164,0.0103358,0.008433927,0.007414656,0.007860629,0.001341285],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01235722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02307445,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002712096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002119408,"domain_scores_codex":[0.05222523,0.5397004,0.3535976,0.008831427,0.04468546,0.0009599121],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.02086123,0.7102629,0.1743753,0.03708246,0.0560689,0.001349304],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"reporting","domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01104555,0.0005154864,0.1090678,0.4140563,0.05095151,0.0006658486,0.01320693,0.005829523,0.003674724,0.0224878,0.0406616,0.327837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01899326,0.006600388,0.1596639,0.391504,0.05341522,0.003102807,0.004841342,0.02773232,0.01376176,0.1128112,0.2056952,0.001878708],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0455709,0.2354769,0.4702832,0.03307316,0.01280795,0.1702037,0.0168317,0.00186227,0.01389019],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2061414,0.03177023,0.4578455,0.008733355,0.003190061,0.2858674,0.005200927,0.0005169089,0.0007341445],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.186466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2299458,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9096875503295264,"score_gpt":0.7236526451516111,"score_spread":0.1860349051779153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}