{"id":"W1996245437","doi":"10.1002/cjce.20214","title":"Treatment of simulated arsenic contaminated groundwater using GAC‐Cu in batch reactor: Optimization of process parameters","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering","topic":"Arsenic contamination and mitigation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee","keywords":"Arsenic; Adsorption; Chemistry; Contaminated groundwater; Activated carbon; Contamination; Nuclear chemistry; Groundwater; Environmental chemistry; Environmental remediation; Geology; Organic chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003695181,0.0006117393,0.0010372,0.0002760863,0.0003636622,0.0005796625,0.0005558599,0.0008186646,0.0006141543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004203562,0.0002640525,0.0004622954,0.0005347576,0.000209976,0.000215487,0.0002035498,0.000495162,0.0002866127],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005918499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006520213,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006876215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0107891,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999689,0.00006556357,0.00003242259,0.00006743551,0.00009477409,0.00005088712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998786,0.00003526327,0.00002465572,0.00001496267,0.0000317746,0.00001465283],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003188334,0.0001124275,0.0002617956,0.0002520244,0.00001863686,0.00004871534,0.00002437407,0.001995245,0.9947813,0.0000196923,0.00004370849,0.002123162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003265174,0.0006838957,0.00212261,0.00001230584,0.00005686988,0.00004391556,0.00003908352,0.005082967,0.9910919,0.00002582103,0.0007862453,0.00002178136],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9950664,0.0007682184,0.002898196,0.0000647959,0.00003104405,0.0001002792,0.000306362,0.00009190623,0.0006727156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894407,0.0008323345,0.008499674,0.00002559363,0.000008327409,0.00009876333,0.0002584818,0.00002017707,0.0008158503],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006876215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01367241,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01061376327516284,"score_gpt":0.2119282993880243,"score_spread":0.2013145361128615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}