{"id":"W1996250965","doi":"10.1118/1.3469144","title":"MO‐FF‐A2‐02: A Technique to Determine the Integral Depth Dose of Proton Pencil Beam Spots","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Physics","topic":"Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Dosimetry; Percentage depth dose curve; Ionization chamber; Beam (structure); Proton; Bragg peak; Pencil-beam scanning; Pencil (optics); Materials science; Isotropy; Optics; Transverse plane; Proton therapy; Ion; Analytical Chemistry (journal); Nuclear medicine; Chemistry; Physics; Nuclear physics; Ionization","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006688767,0.0006423766,0.0003235993,0.001093169,0.0002959628,0.0005916021,0.000675537,0.0008479729,0.001900443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00118392,0.0004254875,0.0002500101,0.0007114293,0.0003466169,0.000571558,0.0003562314,0.0005455121,0.0007395849],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00077319,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005709719,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001725217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002457735,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995052,0.00005550714,0.00001707298,0.0001222486,0.000281047,0.00001901609],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994388,0.0001402348,0.000128692,0.00007973556,0.0001821246,0.00003037356],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004078765,0.00005106025,0.01024202,0.0007157787,0.00007094999,0.0001240014,0.0001084971,0.001670219,0.9020966,0.0007549213,0.001443795,0.08231431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002468566,0.0003017214,0.03008598,0.00003469182,0.00005758383,0.001390111,0.0000389871,0.01209111,0.9422873,0.0001106465,0.01352218,0.00005495421],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.409192,0.01579617,0.5555739,0.0004760454,0.0002189033,0.0004637305,0.001577889,0.004418564,0.01228281],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6644018,0.002318796,0.3246012,0.0003304588,0.00004304821,0.0002843703,0.0005654425,0.0003903714,0.00706446],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001900443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.00635761,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01920936418472996,"score_gpt":0.301205745638581,"score_spread":0.281996381453851,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}