{"id":"W1996304262","doi":"10.1108/13590791211266368","title":"Scholarly communication in <i>Journal of Financial Crime</i>, 2006‐2010: a bibliometric study","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Financial Crime","topic":"Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Ranking (information retrieval); Bibliometrics; Productivity; Political science; Accounting; Sociology; Social science; Economics; Library science; Qualitative research","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007842204,0.0002298653,0.0007259367,0.00759509,0.0004548527,0.0003159828,0.001145072,0.0002539556,0.00009892348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008387059,0.0002157652,0.0003159193,0.01281937,0.0002437101,0.005498246,0.0001080668,0.001386029,0.00001782917],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005201672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001857967,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005036536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001477821,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9953319,0.0007855041,0.001432738,0.0001404903,0.001643885,0.0006654949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953182,0.0005027945,0.002177367,0.0003207999,0.001363082,0.0003177449],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001210198,0.007201289,0.7435485,0.00005508557,0.00007786016,0.0001627053,0.07383326,0.00002041703,0.001826666,0.00743723,0.09430383,0.07032294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001654257,0.0006805906,0.9189695,0.0001424468,0.00008434346,0.00004714977,0.002860882,6.125863e-7,0.0003435808,0.0008801834,0.07410462,0.0002318123],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9796813,0.0122501,0.0001519251,0.0003985984,0.002538685,0.0002676486,0.00001395969,0.000009287673,0.004688549],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943092,0.001803023,0.00055691,0.0002854101,0.00257269,0.000003401812,4.741981e-7,0.00002121689,0.0004476134],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.175421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999657,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05578842661369737,"score_gpt":0.3414034043009733,"score_spread":0.2856149776872759,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}