{"id":"W1996358874","doi":"10.1007/s10979-005-8122-9","title":"Racial Bias in Mock Juror Decision-Making: A Meta-Analytic Review of Defendant Treatment.","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Law and Human Behavior","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":321,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Jury; Racial bias; Legal psychology; Social psychology; Empirical research; Meta-analysis; In-group favoritism; White (mutation); Racism; Criminology; Social group; Law; Political science; Epistemology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01848703,0.001067591,0.005994462,0.005730556,0.0004180284,0.001717035,0.002000591,0.001340463,0.002333606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06798854,0.0007445485,0.006033731,0.006208316,0.0007864959,0.00128641,0.001021455,0.0009405916,0.0002579405],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002149712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004257191,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00371731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01186468,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9892308,0.006389466,0.002054933,0.0006065748,0.001632465,0.00008570773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9528531,0.038674,0.004914327,0.0008448892,0.002408699,0.0003050406],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001105494,0.00006759077,0.003322673,0.6126086,0.06071227,0.00008996942,0.0003559566,0.0003745601,0.0002558539,0.0005931258,0.004851089,0.3156628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001305564,0.001202978,0.02306612,0.5690272,0.3490189,0.000865493,0.0006006082,0.0005695991,0.001025051,0.002424736,0.05078104,0.0001126617],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006784752,0.9987679,0.0001300886,0.0001277365,0.00004677711,0.00004512196,0.00006933744,0.000003756932,0.0001308081],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02462982,0.9735806,0.001005086,0.0003045523,0.00007438577,0.0001706762,0.0001647078,0.000006414286,0.00006377873],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.981513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09776986,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3653564970084659,"score_gpt":0.5213447118406104,"score_spread":0.1559882148321445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}