{"id":"W1996385652","doi":"10.1007/s10489-011-0281-4","title":"A flexible edge matching technique for object detection in dynamic environment","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Intelligence","topic":"Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Robustness (evolution); Enhanced Data Rates for GSM Evolution; Artificial intelligence; Edge detection; Matching (statistics); Computer vision; Template matching; Noise (video); Pixel; Pattern recognition (psychology); Flexibility (engineering); Image (mathematics); Image processing; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003819767,0.000175438,0.0001675278,0.000183025,0.00008491801,0.00003302158,0.0006900517,0.00009437431,0.00001470097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001750044,0.0001756178,0.00005673184,0.0003349948,0.00005165781,0.0003428473,0.0002017256,0.0001954174,0.00004657738],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001462549,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002195656,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000356781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009658353,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987221,0.00001714695,0.0003067544,0.0004911112,0.0001326135,0.0003302717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992672,0.00007469067,0.00009718895,0.0004915852,0.0000191052,0.00005018813],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000432857,0.00009495766,0.000007919812,0.00003077428,0.000005135869,0.000004582739,0.0009616822,0.00004650259,0.2335564,0.04077521,0.000005369963,0.7244681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003562277,0.0001091069,0.00006513889,0.00001783007,0.000001786143,0.00000691018,0.00004835113,0.001110448,0.772049,0.2259348,0.0004535394,0.0001675071],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003356714,0.00008216181,0.9954773,0.00001120481,0.0000583957,0.001058457,0.000001163604,0.0003121568,0.002663505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6290484,0.0001103999,0.3700566,0.00006811762,0.000008460679,0.0006474454,8.229243e-7,0.00001292248,0.00004686269],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7243006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7161487,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02891459345250782,"score_gpt":0.2783189604351737,"score_spread":0.2494043669826659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}