{"id":"W1996438631","doi":"10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.411.241","title":"Radius Constraint Least-Square Circle Fitting Method","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Advanced materials research","topic":"Image and Object Detection Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"MD Precision (Canada)","funders":"Xi'an Technological University","keywords":"RADIUS; Square (algebra); Economic shortage; Curve fitting; Constraint (computer-aided design); Arc (geometry); Arc length; Center (category theory); Base (topology); Mathematics; Algorithm; Mathematical analysis; Geometry; Computer science; Statistics; Chemistry; Crystallography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008849389,0.001323686,0.001717311,0.001400728,0.00095537,0.001275225,0.002495697,0.001489702,0.006175546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003831502,0.0007412056,0.00101207,0.002201125,0.0006454884,0.001935952,0.001217776,0.00145374,0.004540843],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007577849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001679029,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005697576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003235144,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975229,0.0003699209,0.0001271974,0.0006267615,0.001224555,0.0001285886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982798,0.0003213329,0.0001229944,0.0002456261,0.000971255,0.00005888125],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028258,0.00008523056,0.001756073,0.0005517747,0.000181113,0.000244058,0.0003277576,0.176729,0.04722241,0.02513441,0.01744515,0.7300406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001781164,0.00004497769,0.0005666499,0.00002386368,0.00003236775,0.0003015178,0.00004342326,0.9565786,0.0213775,0.004581885,0.01636228,0.00006906738],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.001072887,0.0001920329,0.9966995,0.00003638451,0.00003906505,0.00002876539,0.00003388338,0.0007974309,0.001100048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1103022,0.0008241002,0.8770089,0.0001236575,0.0001157903,0.0002018994,0.0006068044,0.0007371535,0.01007945],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006175546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02065927,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08839423769950883,"score_gpt":0.388691910648532,"score_spread":0.3002976729490232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}