{"id":"W1996438631","doi":"10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.411.241","title":"Radius Constraint Least-Square Circle Fitting Method","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Advanced materials research","topic":"Image and Object Detection Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"MD Precision (Canada)","funders":"Xi'an Technological University","keywords":"RADIUS; Square (algebra); Economic shortage; Curve fitting; Constraint (computer-aided design); Arc (geometry); Arc length; Center (category theory); Base (topology); Mathematics; Algorithm; Mathematical analysis; Geometry; Computer science; Statistics; Chemistry; Crystallography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002644182,0.0001345533,0.0002278891,0.0002906917,0.0003144747,0.0002179296,0.0009070651,0.00008857383,0.0003667285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003464227,0.0001356609,0.00004805805,0.0005151258,0.0001343498,0.000743379,0.0004608202,0.0002491834,0.0002103535],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008041504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009249449,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001858641,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005325569,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997451,0.0005948896,0.0003228189,0.0005212672,0.0004550687,0.0006549742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985054,0.0002034051,0.00007853435,0.0007285314,0.0003630132,0.0001210895],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002533294,0.00003320976,0.000003255708,0.00003514998,0.00000670927,0.00005444568,0.0005462817,8.928842e-7,0.5902501,0.004566123,0.0001065013,0.404372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002115455,0.0002059981,0.0002645445,0.00004078022,0.000001214655,0.00005479079,0.0001646265,0.00006076051,0.9773701,0.01974918,0.001719362,0.0001570977],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0273063,0.00009139786,0.9594092,0.0001523937,0.0004713712,0.0005252769,0.0000087946,0.0007107771,0.01132445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6472675,0.00003607972,0.352132,0.00007950411,0.00007034982,0.0001105596,0.000001435391,0.00001713465,0.0002854844],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6199611,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.553209,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08839423769950883,"score_gpt":0.388691910648532,"score_spread":0.3002976729490232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}