{"id":"W1996503589","doi":"10.1063/1.3491814","title":"Analytic energy gradient in combined time-dependent density functional theory and polarizable force field calculation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Chemical Physics","topic":"Advanced Chemical Physics Studies","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ryerson University","keywords":"Time-dependent density functional theory; Polarizability; Dipole; Density functional theory; Physics; Polarization (electrochemistry); Excited state; Force field (fiction); Discrete dipole approximation; Vector potential; Quantum mechanics; Chemistry; Magnetic field; Molecule","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002129468,0.0001273747,0.00023096,0.00001848968,0.000053642,0.00001299456,0.0001285694,0.00003554374,0.0000257068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003233068,0.00009107176,0.00008727891,0.0001047676,0.0001011849,0.00014009,0.0000922578,0.0004557293,0.000002121582],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002767295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001941562,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000228932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001110267,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992368,0.0000410158,0.0002576201,0.00009683076,0.0002024523,0.0001653382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989423,0.0005359555,0.0002075947,0.0001389291,0.0001091256,0.00006607657],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002655416,0.0002049903,0.002037727,0.000004451689,0.00009458354,6.67107e-7,0.0001219792,0.0005686914,0.966455,0.02796711,0.0002343558,0.002044895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004542398,0.00003355008,0.0002014496,0.000009908706,0.00005506168,0.000002642857,0.00002583975,0.0005177633,0.4760634,0.5225344,0.00001616364,0.00008557355],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9673164,0.000023619,0.03147346,0.000170622,0.00008231318,0.0000407327,0.00000328737,0.0000050912,0.0008844659],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992563,0.000001656703,0.0001062883,0.00009347495,0.0004256555,0.000001218107,0.000005261003,0.00001087773,0.00009932836],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4945673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3713799,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.004943593442658593,"score_gpt":0.2122946636546387,"score_spread":0.2073510702119801,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}