{"id":"W1996551851","doi":"10.1115/ipc2014-33251","title":"Practical Application of Low Constraint SENT Fracture Toughness Testing for Pipeline Girth Welds","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Fatigue and fracture mechanics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Research Council Canada","keywords":"Materials science; Fracture toughness; Brittleness; Constraint (computer-aided design); Toughness; Structural engineering; Charpy impact test; Girth (graph theory); Failure assessment; Composite material; Welding; Tensile testing; Ultimate tensile strength; Fracture (geology); Mechanical engineering; Engineering; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001906218,0.0001114351,0.0001570287,0.0000284322,0.0000250661,0.00001064084,0.00006094011,0.0001180977,0.00002651768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003009198,0.00009435323,0.00003976248,0.00008322536,0.00001670886,0.00006026434,0.000009871113,0.0001322763,0.000007748079],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001532637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001408907,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000102816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001079505,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999393,0.000009522651,0.0002219016,0.0001238416,0.000100122,0.0001515993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992222,0.0003872185,0.0000518186,0.000183856,0.0001035307,0.00005143711],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008067018,0.0004168432,0.001211254,0.002791384,0.0001295952,0.000003577079,0.0005830976,0.2041325,0.1113204,0.10652,0.03512549,0.5376852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002823964,0.00005296206,0.0001355832,0.00002460711,0.00001940929,0.000006633094,0.00005442102,0.9160215,0.06616615,0.00123177,0.01586486,0.0001396596],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.002707986,0.00001168527,0.9935302,0.0005122231,0.000130154,0.0002718966,0.000006557174,0.0001537427,0.00267555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9155141,0.000001475239,0.08398554,0.0002248453,0.0001785146,0.00002878241,0.00002326727,0.00002032984,0.0000231214],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9128062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3847613,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01650105588724374,"score_gpt":0.2584961063456342,"score_spread":0.2419950504583905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}