{"id":"W1996632823","doi":"10.1016/j.artint.2014.04.002","title":"Erratum to ‘A logic for reasoning about ambiguity’ [Artificial Intelligence 209 (2014) 1–10]","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"erratum","venue":"Artificial Intelligence","topic":"AI-based Problem Solving and Planning","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Cognitive science; Automated reasoning; Psychology; Programming language","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003436327,0.001290381,0.001378511,0.0007901237,0.00125003,0.001807786,0.005360456,0.001317068,0.000437482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003062168,0.001337635,0.0006060521,0.001515272,0.0003013536,0.0005846692,0.001028064,0.002042798,0.004336634],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002959471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009429892,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004318588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006320801,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9910232,0.000442948,0.002205316,0.002906135,0.001201897,0.002220492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932067,0.001275311,0.0009808968,0.002633898,0.001122233,0.0007809329],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008329713,0.00009860701,0.000003201126,0.0001572546,0.00005294111,0.00003045179,0.001070563,0.003417535,0.0001065075,0.185072,0.5981545,0.2117531],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002230423,0.001215099,0.00001052404,0.001410316,0.0001092948,0.00003085828,0.0002961113,0.2796192,0.007724413,0.3601469,0.3470095,0.002405496],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.00001742834,0.001387309,0.9459574,0.003435887,0.0338151,0.001273446,0.0001282139,0.0007863367,0.01319894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06162513,0.0007575392,0.5913235,0.01308872,0.0284595,0.002037895,0.001663562,0.0009155994,0.3001286],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3546338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999848,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06924589181398444,"score_gpt":0.3227499740364634,"score_spread":0.253504082222479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}