{"id":"W1996692529","doi":"10.1080/02680939.2014.895853","title":"Exposing ideology within university policies: a critical discourse analysis of faculty hiring, promotion and remuneration practices","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education Policy","topic":"Higher Education Governance and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Remuneration; Ideology; Disadvantaged; Promotion (chess); Neoliberalism (international relations); Critical discourse analysis; Sociology; Public relations; Higher education; Political science; Turkish; Discourse analysis; Economic growth; Public administration; Social science; Economics; Politics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02301115,0.0007766382,0.0007301422,0.005940604,0.01458771,0.01533377,0.001554414,0.0033201,0.001498971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02118023,0.000391748,0.0003832439,0.004559006,0.03781777,0.01313559,0.005315764,0.004449275,0.0001345705],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01787151,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008719125,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008318563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006120948,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9867596,0.01030205,0.0002985447,0.000593906,0.001126991,0.0009188793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9581013,0.03728284,0.001706989,0.0007728959,0.001573207,0.0005627943],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002436041,0.00001734146,0.000650764,0.00007474559,0.000003925038,0.0002179265,0.9068792,0.00009594532,0.0003330498,0.0870651,0.0005036141,0.004134088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007495835,0.00001788694,0.001236387,0.0004066365,0.000009910084,0.0001092191,0.9524227,0.0005372334,0.0009590745,0.01955431,0.02471759,0.00002154361],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.857264,0.0045899,0.02533866,0.03201126,0.0004614471,0.0002504837,0.0001666468,0.00007200733,0.07984555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957452,0.0005105103,0.001912327,0.0004350584,0.00006709963,0.00007438962,0.00002275755,0.00002542521,0.001207215],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9769889,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1296675,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04540650765656538,"score_gpt":0.4519312328184362,"score_spread":0.4065247251618708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}