{"id":"W1996724954","doi":"10.1139/l10-125","title":"Optimum compromise among environmental dispute issues using attitude based negotiation","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Compromise; Management science; Computer science; Conflict resolution; Negotiation theory; Dispute resolution; Risk analysis (engineering); Operations research; Process management; Environmental economics; Business; Economics; Engineering; Political science; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00143958,0.0002018498,0.0003629802,0.0009992491,0.0001346812,0.0002784383,0.0007630356,0.00009020181,0.002841386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007955219,0.000182986,0.0001814584,0.0003187428,0.00007363542,0.0008022921,0.0000363292,0.0002542886,0.00003658402],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002766064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002242428,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007005347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009637783,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997582,0.00007773235,0.0009069619,0.0002420482,0.0007982162,0.0003930906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981188,0.0002106628,0.0004124618,0.0003760242,0.0001111188,0.0007709513],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004429891,0.00005833765,0.1963413,0.00001810185,0.00009312655,0.0009591415,0.003482477,0.7791259,0.01332057,0.0001253094,0.001805595,0.004625836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000638796,0.00006014525,0.2589495,0.0001824398,0.0000320041,0.000102409,0.0002348871,0.7336822,0.0009533954,0.000216688,0.004618271,0.0003291907],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7779742,0.0004486727,0.2197748,0.00004909268,0.001317126,0.0001080775,0.00001781208,0.00001261573,0.0002975995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9766536,0.000002648758,0.02301631,0.00004617403,0.0001947513,8.802299e-7,0.00000118042,0.00003100275,0.000053482],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1986793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980702,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1123238466107767,"score_gpt":0.308599199578136,"score_spread":0.1962753529673593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}