{"id":"W1996832186","doi":"10.1177/0739456x05282831","title":"The Paradox of the Rational Comprehensive Model of Planning","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Planning Education and Research","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rational planning model; Environmental planning; Public participation; Action (physics); Business; Waste disposal; Public administration; Engineering; Political science; Waste management; Civil engineering; Environmental science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005475241,0.00003993901,0.00007536488,0.00003077794,0.0002810178,0.00002067157,0.0001638299,0.00002730991,0.00002303032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004031938,0.00002163544,0.00003536757,0.0001102291,0.0003532294,0.00009842905,0.00007152017,0.0002038746,0.000001147021],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006466512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009016306,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008596465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002461673,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989371,0.0001193531,0.0002251348,0.00004738349,0.0005656183,0.0001054634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994478,0.0002069651,0.000202897,0.00006607018,0.00003925233,0.00003705932],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008109826,0.0004325753,0.8085081,0.00002103392,0.00003061949,9.511377e-7,0.00698981,0.06928892,0.08433694,0.0009455009,0.0265053,0.002859159],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001786215,0.00006492396,0.9844563,0.0000732985,0.00000663342,0.0000110771,0.003783771,0.002043234,0.002450005,0.004700238,0.002193533,0.00003833432],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9956675,0.0003477634,0.00006954512,0.0007396166,0.0001049324,0.00006482717,0.000001953133,5.550799e-7,0.003003347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998514,0.00003312503,0.0003342991,0.00002986923,0.00006007383,0.000001283512,8.454899e-7,0.000002882725,0.001023633],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1759482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.216139,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0734463606688679,"score_gpt":0.4130258982870529,"score_spread":0.339579537618185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}