{"id":"W1996867876","doi":"10.1200/jco.2007.11.3670","title":"Statistical Power of Negative Randomized Controlled Trials Presented at American Society for Clinical Oncology Annual Meetings","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","topic":"Advanced Causal Inference Techniques","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Princess Margaret Cancer Centre; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sample size determination; Medicine; Post-hoc analysis; Randomized controlled trial; Hazard ratio; Odds ratio; Logistic regression; Internal medicine; Post hoc; Clinical endpoint; Statistical power; Confidence interval; Clinical trial; Clinical Oncology; Statistics; Cancer","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.7238745,0.002488714,0.008963897,0.01050501,0.00189279,0.009596736,0.004062354,0.006907733,0.006571847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.9053621,0.002369306,0.009702403,0.007986551,0.007604512,0.008567407,0.005439077,0.004749494,0.0008278366],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003626979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005601437,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004827285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004912436,"domain_scores_codex":[0.1580383,0.6691232,0.1074366,0.01729627,0.04612212,0.00198349],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.03124146,0.881694,0.05370222,0.01732443,0.01483402,0.001203839],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.06747259,0.001145531,0.3235188,0.1347823,0.1013734,0.002704476,0.005826664,0.006998605,0.002824905,0.02960311,0.03477927,0.2889704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.05195381,0.02633926,0.2771887,0.1183004,0.1238457,0.007095055,0.005452368,0.06418246,0.01015553,0.16117,0.1531578,0.001159058],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.205593,0.3274225,0.2870209,0.04821676,0.01774092,0.07188785,0.01039174,0.001447498,0.03027892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8399038,0.009887587,0.07372599,0.01078677,0.002819774,0.05963057,0.001798403,0.0003078208,0.001139331],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2761255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3405119,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.4119385914980047,"score_gpt":0.6415961380156108,"score_spread":0.2296575465176061,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}