{"id":"W1996893079","doi":"10.5558/tfc81369-3","title":"A method for estimating vulnerability of Douglas-fir growth to climate change in the northwestern U.S.","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Forestry Chronicle","topic":"Tree-ring climate responses","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; U.S. Geological Survey; Joint Institute for the Study of the Atmosphere and Ocean","keywords":"Climate change; Montane ecology; Douglas fir; Range (aeronautics); Vulnerability (computing); Geography; Precipitation; Ecology; Productivity; Dendrochronology; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Physical geography; Forestry; Biology; Meteorology; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001849695,0.0001396874,0.0001911359,0.00004924438,0.0001860101,0.00004516334,0.000567807,0.00004662314,0.00009450156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001284722,0.00007947358,0.00007766503,0.000278482,0.00007933479,0.0001923588,0.00004071897,0.000144395,0.00005158479],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001783987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000413501,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005926228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04487881,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985483,0.0002360073,0.0003073481,0.0002282287,0.0002160806,0.0004640097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980733,0.001343671,0.0001057275,0.0003906403,0.00003037669,0.00005625741],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003954233,0.00008001121,0.7905344,0.0002090322,0.00001433954,0.000003467787,0.00569195,0.03154463,0.00007050526,0.0003957291,0.00008961638,0.1709708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000401016,0.0002069885,0.8626334,0.00004865365,0.0000147602,0.00001584909,0.000197993,0.1349048,0.0002670202,0.0005365697,0.0006606399,0.0001123309],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9951785,0.00027173,0.0008164358,0.002386846,0.0001308343,0.0007563114,0.0001801281,0.00003453246,0.000244638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9692484,0.0000128047,0.02987588,0.0004213805,0.0003728351,0.00003948614,0.00001804757,0.000006547996,0.000004602051],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1708585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9725497,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03922353198342003,"score_gpt":0.3137793320534339,"score_spread":0.2745558000700138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}