{"id":"W1996910983","doi":"10.1037/h0087405","title":"Examining the role of the fixation cue in inhibition of return.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale","topic":"Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Inhibition of return; Stimulus onset asynchrony; Cued speech; Fixation (population genetics); Psychology; Stimulus (psychology); Peripheral; Selective attention; Neuroscience; Audiology; Visual attention; Perception; Cognition; Cognitive psychology; Medicine; Internal medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005175394,0.0002455471,0.0003871101,0.0003561726,0.0002079757,0.00001604817,0.0008764908,0.0001720603,0.0003208665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002211092,0.0001760171,0.0001820779,0.0006765752,0.001056917,0.000203348,0.00005021806,0.0005547765,0.000007512161],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003502827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006542378,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001626767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01004098,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975413,0.000370183,0.0008582679,0.0004173027,0.0001250507,0.0006878916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982296,0.0001261333,0.0007476813,0.000543204,0.00006514485,0.0002882633],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005359162,0.0002210494,0.05203222,0.000004263706,0.00001202073,0.0001115758,0.005676254,0.000008533285,0.938021,0.0001981899,0.002068065,0.001593242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001453146,0.0008374272,0.0640735,0.0001459673,0.00002321913,0.001079024,0.008924668,0.00001642921,0.9205934,0.001228027,0.001400342,0.0002248487],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9881896,0.002283802,0.000002045219,0.001856485,0.00156783,0.0003301025,0.00003863869,0.000006425923,0.005725067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980559,0.00005478898,0.00007072165,0.001557478,0.00009845501,0.00002180064,0.000001082049,0.00002283915,0.0001168989],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01742759,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.717777,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1438437964465576,"score_gpt":0.3296626285339849,"score_spread":0.1858188320874272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}