{"id":"W1996910983","doi":"10.1037/h0087405","title":"Examining the role of the fixation cue in inhibition of return.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale","topic":"Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Inhibition of return; Stimulus onset asynchrony; Cued speech; Fixation (population genetics); Psychology; Stimulus (psychology); Peripheral; Selective attention; Neuroscience; Audiology; Visual attention; Perception; Cognition; Cognitive psychology; Medicine; Internal medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006732775,0.000503892,0.0005530529,0.0002815202,0.0002338915,0.0004479192,0.0003980398,0.0004008622,0.001401406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004490836,0.0001906777,0.0002200772,0.0001517694,0.0005871498,0.0005052208,0.00038668,0.0005671586,0.0002196131],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005809391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004486298,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003781065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002385314,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996774,0.00006850575,0.00002310045,0.00007329491,0.00008396214,0.00007362383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977115,0.001392478,0.0004338074,0.0001440212,0.0001977714,0.0001204048],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002320681,0.0001008391,0.002418241,0.0001837289,0.00001568443,0.0001610709,0.0001941204,0.00009114654,0.9865223,0.0003369921,0.00005103524,0.007604264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001946871,0.003671611,0.244063,0.00009248205,0.0002264446,0.001052739,0.0004587733,0.004129584,0.7426425,0.0008447351,0.002574058,0.00004948253],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9907273,0.001647556,0.003438449,0.00005723841,0.00005081402,0.00004479803,0.0000649072,0.00004505137,0.00392397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973437,0.0005010665,0.001014983,0.00006674961,0.0000135683,0.00003033308,0.00008754662,0.00003777422,0.0009042667],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003781065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007518113,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1438437964465576,"score_gpt":0.3296626285339849,"score_spread":0.1858188320874272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}