{"id":"W1996928853","doi":"10.3138/cjccj.46.4.395","title":"Classification without Validity or Equity: An Empirical Examination of the Custody Rating Scale for Federally Sentenced Women Offenders in Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice/La Revue canadienne de criminologie et de justice pénale","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Equity (law); Psychology; Mandate; Scale (ratio); Rating scale; Population; Criminology; Predictive validity; Recidivism; Empirical research; Actuarial science; Political science; Sociology; Clinical psychology; Law; Demography; Business; Geography; Statistics; Developmental psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02239487,0.0003779343,0.0008097184,0.003519322,0.007858729,0.003768167,0.003017922,0.0008612038,0.001587506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1161403,0.0006052439,0.0009097709,0.006328181,0.006534026,0.001690435,0.003332874,0.00228236,0.0002136468],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03913793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0527768,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9571269,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9773012,"domain_scores_codex":[0.979477,0.005772538,0.001447317,0.001400286,0.009648941,0.002253906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9099815,0.03321965,0.01770706,0.003695883,0.0311788,0.004217121],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008967815,0.0002421546,0.9454772,0.00008362159,0.0000728436,0.000144013,0.04042574,0.0001014569,0.0001069679,0.0008898672,0.0007827236,0.01158364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001276877,0.00007828596,0.9533569,0.0001257241,0.00002931999,0.00006328131,0.04392636,0.001014174,0.0001017819,0.0001205313,0.001142402,0.00002850406],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.997315,0.0001274968,0.0000946072,0.000377515,0.00001097941,0.0001175541,0.0001136437,0.000001875766,0.001841385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987931,0.0001687391,0.0002897054,0.0001008696,0.000005869952,0.00005448811,0.0001812581,0.000004873099,0.0004010238],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04287314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2839669,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2224569292784848,"score_gpt":0.3802605502180777,"score_spread":0.1578036209395929,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}