{"id":"W1996928853","doi":"10.3138/cjccj.46.4.395","title":"Classification without Validity or Equity: An Empirical Examination of the Custody Rating Scale for Federally Sentenced Women Offenders in Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice/La Revue canadienne de criminologie et de justice pénale","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Equity (law); Psychology; Mandate; Scale (ratio); Rating scale; Population; Criminology; Predictive validity; Recidivism; Empirical research; Actuarial science; Political science; Sociology; Clinical psychology; Law; Demography; Business; Geography; Statistics; Developmental psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032224,0.0002825405,0.0005883147,0.0005160672,0.000962065,0.0001193172,0.0007897473,0.0003513157,0.00003289046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006357374,0.0002546963,0.0001313731,0.0003334145,0.0007353215,0.0004127897,0.00005204981,0.0007678745,3.70064e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005754393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02878441,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.866091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9981585,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961527,0.001011207,0.0008355093,0.0004026674,0.0002370369,0.001360858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961007,0.001068328,0.0006825986,0.0003163232,0.000778991,0.001053009],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001506798,0.0004790606,0.04102781,0.00509457,0.0002702135,0.001376109,0.788636,0.01524779,0.002799509,0.03712796,0.0004550201,0.1059792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008137134,0.0004777666,0.09144845,0.0002117251,0.003505765,0.0006237712,0.8998631,0.001002643,0.0001333939,0.001251073,0.0003707193,0.0002978588],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9915977,0.0001064282,0.003681521,0.00307496,0.0005718084,0.0003071396,0.00003481501,0.00001086662,0.0006148264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962187,0.0002409961,0.001975172,0.001172904,0.000234645,0.00004207623,0.000008217273,0.00002416896,0.00008314338],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1320674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999905,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2224569292784848,"score_gpt":0.3802605502180777,"score_spread":0.1578036209395929,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}