{"id":"W1996931268","doi":"10.1017/s0317167100005734","title":"A Comprehensive Analysis of MRI Research Risks: In Support of Full Disclosure","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques","topic":"Anesthesia and Sedative Agents","field":"Medicine","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"National Research Council Canada; National Research Council Institute for Biodiagnostics; St.Amant; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Informed consent; Research ethics; Risk analysis (engineering); Ethical issues; Medicine; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Business; Political science; Law; Alternative medicine; Psychiatry; Engineering; Pathology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1965806,0.000603552,0.001083572,0.00724861,0.00438737,0.005774927,0.003102297,0.003895831,0.003025918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.524686,0.0005607997,0.001086912,0.005895854,0.002160727,0.005442738,0.005606912,0.004980502,0.0007950175],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007875768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07050285,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009762182,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01697234,"domain_scores_codex":[0.6866976,0.1353622,0.05060799,0.002412444,0.1191452,0.005774513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.335142,0.3148005,0.0832492,0.02802408,0.2261375,0.01264681],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004447127,0.0002512742,0.11055,0.004879457,0.0004410521,0.003983447,0.03216136,0.001139367,0.002493591,0.07577569,0.1846205,0.5832595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001485644,0.0005895215,0.1939505,0.01309626,0.0006895546,0.01265263,0.03511751,0.008483243,0.004175779,0.05882804,0.6717215,0.0005469314],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.161393,0.01516627,0.09735401,0.4852818,0.002109307,0.01685268,0.005093332,0.0006947261,0.2160549],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7067127,0.01387174,0.2240588,0.03012498,0.001921813,0.008741007,0.002212279,0.0002047001,0.01215203],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8034194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9907591,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1475117624692584,"score_gpt":0.3959152603637491,"score_spread":0.2484034978944907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}