{"id":"W1996993226","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0042836","title":"Reviews of Functional MRI: The Ethical Dimensions of Methodological Critique","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; NeuroDevNet","funders":"National Institute of Mental Health; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; British Columbia Knowledge Development Fund; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Neuroethics; Neuroimaging; Context (archaeology); Vulnerability (computing); Mental health; Research ethics; Psychology; Bioethics; Mental illness; Value (mathematics); Engineering ethics; Medicine; Psychiatry; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.5867699,0.001279409,0.003000451,0.01370049,0.004153545,0.01365908,0.005811815,0.01115172,0.001613852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8314512,0.001679223,0.002219273,0.00958533,0.02409884,0.01311722,0.008720258,0.00822096,0.0007744532],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007568558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01955598,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00224606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004119686,"domain_scores_codex":[0.2278379,0.6119075,0.08110341,0.01114129,0.06619964,0.001810279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.0544449,0.8422529,0.0365843,0.02249014,0.04290215,0.001325606],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006190378,0.0001165652,0.006981925,0.04843353,0.002154854,0.001323948,0.09171975,0.001139974,0.001931101,0.3333216,0.1216703,0.3905875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002913341,0.0001958073,0.006892345,0.09667818,0.001213223,0.001638509,0.0259534,0.002452689,0.002762025,0.405849,0.4558068,0.0002667804],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.01108419,0.3479582,0.09360367,0.5057617,0.02802652,0.001306634,0.0002737919,0.0002101925,0.01177499],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3302212,0.1726778,0.1698492,0.270557,0.042999,0.007800577,0.0002747813,0.0008058394,0.004814556],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4132301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5095863,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.5995842785880194,"score_gpt":0.4311580472174703,"score_spread":0.1684262313705492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}