{"id":"W1997066779","doi":"10.1002/fam.938","title":"Manikin test for flame engulfment evaluation of protective clothing: Historical review and development of a new ISO standard","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fire and Materials","topic":"Fire dynamics and safety research","field":"Engineering","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Clothing; European standard; Test (biology); Combustor; Aeronautics; Test method; Round robin test; Engineering; International standard; Forensic engineering; Computer science; Architectural engineering; Simulation; Automotive engineering; Telecommunications; Chemistry; Combustion; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006882905,0.00006964103,0.0002384847,0.00002206921,0.00002477726,0.000008527089,0.00002986097,0.00003582324,0.00002742695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000059662,0.00006126747,0.00001205778,0.0000296643,0.000008869688,0.00002777586,0.00001898649,0.00001958765,3.219331e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001416327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006528405,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009872938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001966068,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993621,0.0000182232,0.0002780127,0.0000872731,0.0001660248,0.00008835788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997418,0.00002971893,0.00004645596,0.00006068735,0.00009824514,0.00002307155],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002828237,0.0001677186,0.000220182,0.02852052,0.0002185434,0.000001771777,0.003007938,0.0001511233,0.5339696,0.001422157,0.01796232,0.4140753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007416096,0.001602608,0.03083228,0.005780553,0.0007074507,0.00001942521,0.000125625,0.01100158,0.6500263,0.01174741,0.2794442,0.001296484],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9603227,0.02638663,0.008612261,0.0003447379,0.000222582,0.003551908,0.0002218042,0.00004617151,0.0002912064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902043,0.001400007,0.007908136,0.000008272573,0.00006279055,0.0002051202,0.00004364961,0.0000218571,0.0001459124],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4127788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2498415,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03091372442489021,"score_gpt":0.2787189967269894,"score_spread":0.2478052723020991,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}