{"id":"W1997106220","doi":"10.3138/carto.48.3.1531","title":"A Cartographic Framework for Visualizing Risk","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cartographica The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization","topic":"Geographic Information Systems Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Illinois State University","keywords":"Hazard; Climate change; Key (lock); Cartography; Geography; Representation (politics); Computer science; Environmental resource management; Natural hazard; Risk analysis (engineering); Data science; Business; Environmental science; Meteorology; Geology; Computer security; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001648506,0.001243211,0.0005028131,0.006245792,0.001722586,0.01119713,0.001863464,0.001665596,0.0194671],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006084687,0.0006120945,0.001274405,0.007146926,0.003978593,0.007390792,0.003012373,0.001849748,0.002292759],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002951217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001922453,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02361591,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990175,0.000533958,0.00006125313,0.0001181365,0.0001950395,0.00007411149],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974376,0.001183008,0.0002025862,0.0004521668,0.0005118003,0.0002127787],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003426134,0.0000160905,0.0007262724,0.0002543215,0.00003063503,0.000318489,0.005386895,0.01640523,0.0008133903,0.8961509,0.02630006,0.05356346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003302652,0.00002658537,0.0009982656,0.0004747066,0.00004198568,0.0006352076,0.006818518,0.06781353,0.0007182006,0.4809888,0.4413577,0.00009350648],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.00601001,0.002410862,0.898387,0.007654626,0.0004671995,0.0002395029,0.003240531,0.003759849,0.07783047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1867747,0.002775319,0.7974833,0.0005198322,0.0002629957,0.0005704668,0.002380969,0.0006082054,0.008624252],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.026535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06512398,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0171553278624107,"score_gpt":0.3315608970852277,"score_spread":0.314405569222817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}