{"id":"W1997155188","doi":"10.1109/vast.2014.7042526","title":"Exploiting history to reduce interaction costs in collaborative analysis","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Data Visualization and Analytics","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Dimension (graph theory); Computer science; Visualization; Perspective (graphical); Space (punctuation); Data science; Data visualization; Process (computing); Plan (archaeology); Cognitive dimensions of notations; Exploratory data analysis; Human–computer interaction; Exploratory analysis; Data mining; Cognition; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002592314,0.00005496834,0.0001078568,0.0004141082,0.00002184244,0.00006731557,0.0002562704,0.00001662957,0.00007418772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001632537,0.00005389586,0.00002358279,0.001646676,0.000007051625,0.0004621563,0.00008289093,0.00003990021,0.00007989415],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000297229,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003575329,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009852273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004192962,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993162,0.00008299138,0.0001629111,0.0002183383,0.0001228938,0.00009664158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994813,0.00005787079,0.00005365143,0.0002402556,0.0001038943,0.00006309334],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001750877,0.0002881989,0.007911844,0.00001283831,0.0001747257,0.000008579685,0.01077761,0.01089856,0.004227781,0.7382307,0.1102736,0.117178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001621853,0.00004023169,0.001942663,0.0000147428,0.00001703366,4.452855e-7,0.0006823144,0.8774765,0.001725826,0.00009027365,0.1176836,0.00016426],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.008774697,0.00000763909,0.96696,0.0005908054,0.0001681803,0.00004812704,7.735637e-7,0.0000665899,0.02338321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9785147,0.000002783379,0.01784699,0.001929946,0.00002613376,0.00000616639,0.00001163549,0.000003088197,0.00165859],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.219781,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03025706326625606,"score_gpt":0.3266804305790982,"score_spread":0.2964233673128422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}