{"id":"W1997303977","doi":"10.1016/j.jas.2008.07.011","title":"The use of multiple discriminant analysis in classifying prehistoric phytolith assemblages recovered from cooking residues","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Archaeological Science","topic":"Archaeology and ancient environmental studies","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Phytolith; Biological dispersal; Pottery; Archaeology; Linear discriminant analysis; Principal component analysis; Geography; Prehistory; Correspondence analysis; Biology; Ecology; Pollen; Statistics; Mathematics; Demography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008814704,0.00009974525,0.0003109253,0.00016683,0.0006210708,0.000009790738,0.0005492804,0.00004021562,0.00006116581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000826698,0.00005102807,0.0001243808,0.0007237532,0.004061819,0.0004176724,0.0001818713,0.0002341599,0.000002495125],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002917343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005074633,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001355785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005401938,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982605,0.0001673226,0.000458741,0.0002063026,0.0005732795,0.0003338352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978375,0.001493922,0.0003974575,0.0001297744,0.00004257426,0.00009875859],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001078957,0.0000236576,0.9874253,0.000001159636,0.00002719364,0.00006521048,0.001092574,0.006510402,0.00055751,0.00001628557,0.00001743675,0.004155423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001421893,0.0002015205,0.9930568,0.00001671584,0.00002749265,0.00001970733,0.0003008842,0.004180637,0.0003140342,0.001110868,0.0005595346,0.00006955828],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9975377,0.001297335,0.0005180159,0.0003191894,0.0001458398,0.00005298491,0.00001262541,0.000004215426,0.0001121374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940025,0.002413441,0.003457258,0.00004442199,0.0000310495,3.207787e-7,0.000001931486,8.68272e-7,0.00004823633],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005631607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986486,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08367544412909361,"score_gpt":0.2440873776019445,"score_spread":0.1604119334728509,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}