{"id":"W1997330696","doi":"10.1139/y09-029","title":"Evaluation of the antidiabetic potential of selected medicinal plant extracts from the Canadian boreal forest used to treat symptoms of diabetes: part II","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology","topic":"Natural Antidiabetic Agents Studies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal; Université Laval; University of Ottawa","funders":"H2020 European Research Council","keywords":"Diabetes mellitus; Taiga; Traditional medicine; Boreal; Medicine; Forestry; Biology; Geography; Ecology; Endocrinology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001370369,0.0005286338,0.0003642348,0.00078604,0.000827575,0.0003575628,0.0002361273,0.0002353733,0.001473021],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001198705,0.0001076159,0.0002943652,0.000730963,0.000213839,0.0001524007,0.0001228893,0.000343859,0.0001201035],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009204228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001549824,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.144491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3551388,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99993,0.000008906864,0.000004209914,0.00001004703,0.00002761841,0.00001921057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998705,0.00001099561,0.0000141019,0.000005044644,0.00006396321,0.00003531942],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001222814,0.0005154496,0.003042404,0.0006419364,0.00007817638,0.0002351552,0.0001487772,0.0001313837,0.9702358,0.00005784432,0.0002190141,0.0234713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004783712,0.01621086,0.4404585,0.0002101347,0.0009865222,0.001252581,0.001384661,0.000586529,0.5124702,0.00006423409,0.02581395,0.00008347295],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9882207,0.006704133,0.000301126,0.0001177463,0.00002430642,0.0002186545,0.000973988,0.00002003549,0.003419426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9860801,0.006744134,0.001939447,0.0002154415,0.00002141805,0.00006389286,0.001392327,0.000009721211,0.003533567],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.855509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2872999,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02226648821595837,"score_gpt":0.2798555804589178,"score_spread":0.2575890922429594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}