{"id":"W1997405168","doi":"10.1139/t09-127","title":"Probabilistic framework for assessing liquefaction hazard at a given site in a specified exposure time using standard penetration testing","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Geotechnical Journal","topic":"Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liquefaction; Probabilistic logic; Penetration test; Standard penetration test; Geotechnical engineering; Soil liquefaction; Hazard; Settlement (finance); Probabilistic analysis of algorithms; Engineering; Reliability engineering; Computer science; Mathematics; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007016171,0.0002339202,0.0002989962,0.0003257466,0.0002457328,0.0002245177,0.0001960508,0.0005898238,0.00006012655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00156675,0.0002568369,0.0001023161,0.000389812,0.00003239122,0.0002180221,0.00002143115,0.001786922,0.00001086512],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001140204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003463418,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003715529,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003899528,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983835,0.00002821886,0.0004898186,0.0002393664,0.0002214221,0.0006376621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987254,0.000257217,0.00007942593,0.0002437798,0.0001475921,0.0005466093],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002249556,0.00001094191,0.00006656083,0.00005548773,0.0000162594,0.00006921909,0.00004893612,0.94745,0.0433782,0.0005196868,0.0001169011,0.008245301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003396503,0.0001006826,0.001901842,0.0002763443,0.00002975837,0.0004026848,0.00001230057,0.9876792,0.0006856633,0.006099778,0.002105374,0.0003667652],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8062147,0.00005508339,0.1921902,0.0002101964,0.0006208061,0.0003546407,0.00002573763,0.0002527392,0.00007592077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9580977,0.000005687643,0.04135289,0.00003517745,0.0003960243,0.00002024609,0.000009013873,0.00006970752,0.00001358401],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.151883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999884,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02013572526050967,"score_gpt":0.2376092257315108,"score_spread":0.2174735004710012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}