{"id":"W1997447652","doi":"10.1093/scipol/sct022","title":"Environmental science and public policy in Executive government: Insights from Australia and Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Public Policy","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Cabinet (room); Public administration; Government (linguistics); Public policy; Public relations; Accountability; Science policy; Political science; Exploratory research; Obligation; Sociology; Social science; Law; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004146569,0.000260162,0.0002075652,0.0002057608,0.0009148291,0.0006757571,0.000577849,0.0000703609,0.0002974892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003487736,0.0002270602,0.00001403196,0.001269819,0.006489592,0.003880238,0.001212259,0.000193025,0.00003995052],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003554276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008949212,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9104773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2802947,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959335,0.00005227049,0.0002522256,0.00077182,0.00193127,0.001058897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984382,0.00004997814,0.0001065091,0.0002688439,0.000009878489,0.001126626],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003050071,0.0001362271,0.9100096,0.000003717383,0.000007037328,0.000006752308,0.001452464,9.537442e-7,0.05934336,0.004034626,0.0007392004,0.02426306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003561191,0.00005115554,0.9884902,0.000005864451,0.000002882682,0.00000859885,0.002261611,0.0001479943,0.0007886305,0.002946097,0.004653084,0.0002878266],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9849479,0.0000519565,0.000001079655,0.004531946,0.0000664602,0.0003094121,0.00006202772,0.00001066,0.01001857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972209,0.0001609552,0.00008326487,0.002067028,0.00007752309,0.0000291958,0.000003094068,0.000009771582,0.0003482279],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6301826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9962142,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0131263418183519,"score_gpt":0.253335205401446,"score_spread":0.2402088635830941,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}