{"id":"W1997466337","doi":"10.1177/0963662509335410","title":"In the public interest: assessing expert and stakeholder influence in public deliberation about biobanks","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Understanding of Science","topic":"Risk Perception and Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Stakeholder; Prima facie; Experiential knowledge; Public relations; Public participation; Biobank; Political science; Engineering ethics; Knowledge management; Epistemology; Computer science; Engineering; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"}],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005597124,0.0001111099,0.0001356144,0.0009667375,0.0009157691,0.002613661,0.0007709435,0.00006361236,0.00005862466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009150154,0.00008974163,0.0000229647,0.003019589,0.00235226,0.00692013,0.00008095361,0.0001827687,0.000001978314],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007380907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004585212,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003017966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003581673,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976378,0.0002332496,0.0003434357,0.0003726027,0.0008255221,0.0005874002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992458,0.0001082132,0.0001392834,0.0002208103,0.0001435124,0.000142424],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001943379,0.0001195076,0.0055061,0.000004956937,0.00000147396,0.00000332061,0.03548214,0.000002837297,0.001215585,0.9383353,0.0004380388,0.01888881],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001359728,0.0001761616,0.3958433,0.0002112779,0.000006016657,0.000009916227,0.445362,0.001896072,0.00007959508,0.1017364,0.05260095,0.0007185553],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.865985,0.0001237177,0.005172807,0.1055614,0.0001865947,0.0003418254,5.870688e-7,0.00004108977,0.02258696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997035,0.0003055568,0.0003501416,0.002213542,0.00003095392,0.000009727385,7.84488e-7,0.000003468769,0.00005086507],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8365989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984217,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2983881626394008,"score_gpt":0.3883963051243476,"score_spread":0.09000814248494687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}