{"id":"W1997629163","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0031672","title":"Selection of Reserves for Woodland Caribou Using an Optimization Approach","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Forest Resource Improvement Association of Alberta; University of Alberta; Alberta-Pacific Forest Industries","keywords":"Woodland caribou; Odocoileus; Woodland; Range (aeronautics); Geography; Opportunity cost; Habitat; Environmental resource management; Ecology; Environmental science; Biology; Economics; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003419066,0.0000534543,0.0001608562,0.00006863727,0.00005212452,0.00001113836,0.00004420614,0.0000549154,0.000109213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002556537,0.00006834298,0.00002766444,0.0000515828,0.00001550346,0.0004424881,0.00001141886,0.00002850711,0.000005315961],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008395115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003388181,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000888287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003171006,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994804,0.000008568921,0.0002427033,0.0001258099,0.00001834627,0.0001241697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996703,0.00001090837,0.000178821,0.00009345153,0.00001007115,0.00003647078],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001332063,0.001092622,0.9533505,0.00006812365,0.0000729673,2.419436e-9,0.0002949799,0.04104809,0.0007864301,0.003237145,0.000007192636,0.00002862399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004937232,0.000107416,0.1185865,0.00001109892,0.00004127384,3.818317e-7,0.00009383435,0.87528,0.004657524,0.0005599804,0.0000154718,0.0001527796],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9251238,0.000166798,0.07327982,0.000009986554,0.00003002098,0.0002144505,0.00005095373,0.000008976147,0.001115192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8889979,0.00002965697,0.1106235,0.00000965523,0.0001056074,0.00002222261,0.0001148774,0.0000132362,0.00008331142],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8347639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2786945,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3444801250947375,"score_gpt":0.2374327349470532,"score_spread":0.1070473901476842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}