{"id":"W1997642084","doi":"10.1111/1467-9663.00157","title":"Agency, place, scale: representations of inner‐city youth identities","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie","topic":"Rural development and sustainability","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Neighbourhood (mathematics); Identity (music); Ideology; Agency (philosophy); Sociology; Place identity; Structure and agency; Identity formation; Argument (complex analysis); Representation (politics); Scale (ratio); Gender studies; Economic geography; Social psychology; Politics; Political science; Geography; Social science; Urban planning; Self-concept; Law; Psychology; Aesthetics; Civil engineering; Cartography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006118979,0.0002000207,0.0003527848,0.00003189372,0.0003581402,0.0000898841,0.0003908193,0.0001919507,0.002115221],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001455246,0.0001071086,0.0002342547,0.0003847512,0.0002323415,0.000410218,0.0001686449,0.0001784257,0.00007656057],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004603192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006651942,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001961134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002222975,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983559,0.0001444529,0.000526753,0.000385363,0.0001752419,0.0004122733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991527,0.0002327302,0.0002138956,0.0001218233,0.0001550793,0.0001237972],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001005468,0.0002568123,0.9493451,0.00003047818,0.0001072197,0.000007430986,0.003633654,0.00001312132,0.003228583,0.001669634,0.005443942,0.03616352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003939677,0.00007535859,0.9649547,0.00001138441,0.00003831895,0.000003364259,0.008248077,0.00001609867,0.001071018,0.003853026,0.02097443,0.0003601973],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.961417,0.0001167475,0.000003290255,0.001251735,0.0002043717,0.0003269718,0.00009004155,0.00009726222,0.03649255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891167,0.0001985062,0.0001014623,0.00009128052,0.0003367843,0.0000325542,0.0001770399,0.000002238355,0.009943423],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03580333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998797,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0178348107905541,"score_gpt":0.2375058170054885,"score_spread":0.2196710062149344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}