{"id":"W1997733142","doi":"10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003098","title":"Consistent Estimation of Gibbs Energy Using Component Contributions","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS Computational Biology","topic":"Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":321,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Biological and Environmental Research; Azrieli Foundation; Advanced Scientific Computing Research; U.S. Department of Energy","keywords":"Gibbs free energy; Thermodynamics; Gibbs sampling; Kinetic energy; Residual; Group (periodic table); Scope (computer science); Chemistry; Computer science; Statistical physics; Econometrics; Mathematics; Statistics; Algorithm; Physics; Bayesian probability","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005320925,0.002150823,0.001662752,0.002750943,0.0007315062,0.002543584,0.00252047,0.001461392,0.002410855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02950758,0.001044571,0.001984558,0.001563329,0.001004665,0.002325624,0.00200498,0.002299921,0.0008892649],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00121201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00212926,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006293211,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004656104,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976035,0.0009247768,0.000140345,0.0005725127,0.0006360397,0.000122924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9876302,0.00888628,0.0005854486,0.001437416,0.001302926,0.0001575929],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001747681,0.0000794917,0.004547276,0.0002426306,0.0002200869,0.0000795989,0.0000976515,0.9200988,0.005607441,0.0155344,0.001052781,0.05226497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007725762,0.00001256918,0.0004055899,0.00001394552,0.00001647862,0.00001302359,0.000007856717,0.9851269,0.0027288,0.01109505,0.0005559428,0.0000161005],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.027902,0.0002744572,0.9696187,0.00008246518,0.00004460817,0.00005028439,0.0002561049,0.00107566,0.0006956086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4823427,0.0004155624,0.5113281,0.000133127,0.00007104572,0.0003195482,0.002354138,0.001552358,0.001483362],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006293211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02814007,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01004624000434059,"score_gpt":0.2369015779786462,"score_spread":0.2268553379743057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}