{"id":"W1997895083","doi":"10.1080/00028487.2011.581979","title":"Characterizing Uncertainty in Fish Stock Assessments: the Case of the Southern New England–Mid‐Atlantic Winter Flounder","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transactions of the American Fisheries Society","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ryerson University","keywords":"Maximum sustainable yield; Winter flounder; Stock (firearms); Stock assessment; Fishing; Fishery; Overfishing; Population; Fish stock; Environmental science; Flounder; Uncertainty; Geography; Statistics; Fisheries management; Mathematics; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Biology; Demography","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02077964,0.0003967344,0.0005193626,0.001804034,0.001439797,0.003220145,0.0009668726,0.001577626,0.00101364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06565599,0.0003931916,0.0007466595,0.001750901,0.002582681,0.002494347,0.00220145,0.001399997,0.00005591307],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006546102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002146994,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07682983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07470424,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9932324,0.003924288,0.0003655444,0.0005409039,0.00147521,0.0004618318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9216577,0.06588103,0.007196606,0.001125022,0.003534397,0.0006052041],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002901487,0.00007023564,0.1813209,0.0001892164,0.000340994,0.004778944,0.002378246,0.6924204,0.001122729,0.07899209,0.00273832,0.0353577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055019,0.0002162539,0.09333503,0.0004118433,0.0001835577,0.001112046,0.005222829,0.749269,0.001326402,0.1429875,0.005698653,0.0001818812],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9330865,0.00100115,0.04451468,0.005966859,0.00003448217,0.00009759412,0.0004886762,0.00003081203,0.0147793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947374,0.0001768683,0.004511917,0.0001128006,0.00002577114,0.00001750569,0.00005751335,0.000003544408,0.0003567139],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07682983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1527652,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03082713280813185,"score_gpt":0.2598619274929075,"score_spread":0.2290347946847756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}