{"id":"W1997980764","doi":"10.1007/s10640-011-9461-2","title":"A Uniform Price Auction for Conservation Easements in the Canadian Prairies","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental and Resource Economics","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Environment and Protected Areas; Natural Resources Canada; Ducks Unlimited Canada; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Easement; Revenue equivalence; Auction theory; Multiunit auction; Common value auction; Generalized second-price auction; Business; Procurement; Vickrey auction; Dutch auction; Environmental economics; Microeconomics; Economics; Marketing; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001923474,0.0002864272,0.0007989347,0.000706171,0.002536428,0.003386372,0.001883353,0.0009034774,0.005314373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005245344,0.0003599246,0.0005174616,0.001005445,0.002393321,0.001771553,0.0006753741,0.0007990153,0.0001619182],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01925875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01472103,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8924214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9524181,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990643,0.0002212478,0.00003357038,0.000140055,0.0002378422,0.0003030029],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989209,0.0004008014,0.0001053186,0.0001393217,0.0002934536,0.0001403027],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001018711,0.0003895416,0.04160022,0.0003039487,0.000224071,0.0005235445,0.001071331,0.4078157,0.004304525,0.3821077,0.01411384,0.1465268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003042738,0.0002216926,0.08156704,0.0000711809,0.0002391005,0.000350717,0.002028623,0.8225951,0.001154806,0.07278932,0.01843765,0.0002405538],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9067496,0.001042851,0.04262623,0.001524541,0.00006209454,0.0002330148,0.0005394674,0.0001205775,0.04710166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877044,0.0001894867,0.007240147,0.00002784242,0.000005739453,0.0000139854,0.00004993312,0.000009594896,0.004758796],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1075786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2164243,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08519089005796192,"score_gpt":0.2653739137750705,"score_spread":0.1801830237171085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}