{"id":"W1998227034","doi":"10.1109/coase.2006.326891","title":"Reliability evaluation of standby safety systems due to independent and common cause failures","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Risk and Safety Analysis","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Unavailability; Reliability engineering; Spurious relationship; Common cause failure; Standby power; Computer science; Reliability (semiconductor); Failure mode and effects analysis; System safety; Engineering; Power (physics); Common cause and special cause; Electrical engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001563773,0.0006692012,0.0004366413,0.001304663,0.0002489611,0.0003747633,0.000490831,0.0003965457,0.000624434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005255126,0.0002291127,0.0005763416,0.0006308288,0.0005094553,0.0005530667,0.0004134809,0.0002868885,0.0001092853],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004235711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002535965,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001339069,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006815494,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989582,0.0003521917,0.00004791517,0.0001039012,0.0004470457,0.00009079203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955223,0.002636215,0.0006372146,0.0003888705,0.0006981408,0.0001173495],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001006962,0.0001191545,0.03955276,0.000242712,0.0002280929,0.0008533873,0.0003997519,0.869334,0.04129954,0.002931687,0.0003525973,0.04367934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001209968,0.0009149422,0.02561394,0.00001479019,0.00007375584,0.0003070857,0.0001507144,0.9615157,0.009911314,0.001209024,0.0002485996,0.0000280896],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9391236,0.0003976035,0.0586274,0.0000301318,0.00001460539,0.00003779814,0.00007053889,0.0001105716,0.001587831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987231,0.000056181,0.001026459,0.000002427812,0.000003636918,0.00001021477,0.0000343674,0.000004848232,0.000138653],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001563773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008270144,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07101717930062072,"score_gpt":0.3770358118959941,"score_spread":0.3060186325953733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}