{"id":"W1998252455","doi":"10.1016/j.matdes.2011.02.044","title":"Two-step method to evaluate equibiaxial residual stress of metal surface based on micro-indentation tests","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Materials & Design (1980-2015)","topic":"Metal and Thin Film Mechanics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; David Suzuki Foundation","keywords":"Indentation; Residual stress; Materials science; Composite material; Stress (linguistics); Finite element method; Residual; Modulus; Elastic modulus; Structural engineering; Mathematics; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005376593,0.0009267189,0.0004924106,0.001168939,0.0003818514,0.0003838227,0.001019597,0.0007853388,0.002998326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008371091,0.0003417093,0.0003754926,0.0006408775,0.0003355257,0.0007036565,0.0005057178,0.0005885807,0.0005342936],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000281042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005398992,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008414704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002153034,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991565,0.00004454522,0.00004728339,0.0001136121,0.0005961375,0.00004191386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990338,0.0002038273,0.000089848,0.0001065123,0.0005302628,0.00003585039],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002067191,0.0001456883,0.003185647,0.0004008093,0.00003188199,0.0001512809,0.0002626572,0.002949084,0.9059358,0.0009205725,0.0006420701,0.08516777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003656856,0.0008105963,0.01972591,0.00002669398,0.00006178444,0.0005411554,0.0002533326,0.1154486,0.8592799,0.0004604807,0.003215563,0.0001393688],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.4913646,0.0007318069,0.4961677,0.0001474962,0.0002328819,0.0006033375,0.0008660753,0.002630615,0.007255456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8385416,0.0002974575,0.1546371,0.00006474878,0.00002733754,0.0004996444,0.0003581851,0.0001038723,0.005470006],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002998326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01003039,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06300288113541297,"score_gpt":0.3077010056794245,"score_spread":0.2446981245440116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}