{"id":"W1998274712","doi":"10.15173/jhap.v2i3.21","title":"On the Paradox of Gestalt Switches: Wittgenstein’s Response to Kohler","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy","topic":"Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; University of Calgary","funders":"Menzies Centre for Australian Studies, King's College London, University of London; King's College London","keywords":"Gestalt psychology; Nothing; Appeal; Epistemology; Philosophy; Perception; Cognitive science; Psychology; Law; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007172516,0.0001869292,0.0003193012,0.0001614934,0.0004404213,0.00004353785,0.0005798888,0.00005116167,0.001485752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002969986,0.00009992717,0.0004217665,0.00007010899,0.0008144368,0.0001262392,0.00003922365,0.0003168465,0.0001936597],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001754394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001185878,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002271398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003352689,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998504,0.00009326868,0.0006047025,0.000174164,0.0003982716,0.0002255685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970528,0.001511989,0.0003361616,0.0005268804,0.0004114403,0.0001606741],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006587721,0.0001689151,0.000001387511,0.00002100747,0.0001446407,7.556048e-7,0.005357129,0.00006836512,0.0005444502,0.7988176,0.1939759,0.0002410269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004065874,0.0008159908,0.0000770427,0.00007999045,0.0001390745,0.000007949392,0.0005871831,0.0002929577,0.0000698831,0.4563185,0.5410417,0.0001631716],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3098674,0.001599228,0.0005814684,0.4242516,0.004136128,0.003158047,0.0001793924,0.00007181845,0.256155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9799357,0.000008268791,0.00005322589,0.002791643,0.0009466171,0.00006357463,9.424018e-7,0.00002723777,0.01617278],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6700683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999427,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08324922563821739,"score_gpt":0.2553702647539898,"score_spread":0.1721210391157724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}