{"id":"W1998355982","doi":"10.1111/j.1533-8525.2009.01158.x","title":"Residential Stability, Neighborhood Racial Composition, and the Subjective Assessment of Neighborhood Problems Among Older Adults","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sociological Quarterly","topic":"Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Socioeconomic status; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Perception; Race (biology); Racial composition; Social psychology; Poison control; Sample (material); Fear of crime; Disadvantage; Demography; Population; Sociology; Geography; Environmental health","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001291528,0.0001819215,0.0002105467,0.0008691135,0.0004725985,0.0005787263,0.0002806203,0.000282417,0.001931942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007066816,0.000114927,0.0003403891,0.0005098862,0.0004019697,0.0005532246,0.0007844824,0.0004243288,0.0001445279],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001997219,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000177495,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007196823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01327282,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992873,0.000248542,0.0001005495,0.00007718793,0.0002224122,0.00006407665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958231,0.0005567332,0.002296162,0.0002261714,0.0006472597,0.0004506349],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003948293,0.00004319355,0.9971675,0.000009243329,0.00004443798,0.00001966633,0.0005592146,0.00004095303,0.0000745425,0.00004122438,0.00007578355,0.001884749],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001198721,0.00005996261,0.9986668,0.00000785154,0.00001131403,0.00004280825,0.0008769601,0.0001298543,0.00003352923,0.00003630069,0.000130272,0.000003237599],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9989349,0.0001373306,0.00007472,0.00007502896,0.000005922476,0.000006428823,0.000124024,0.000001686723,0.0006399446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996301,0.00004946356,0.00006481371,0.0000126526,0.000006183998,0.000004523007,0.000101817,6.511325e-7,0.0001297729],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007196823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01430982,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01670391182672168,"score_gpt":0.296715186984907,"score_spread":0.2800112751581854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}