{"id":"W1998458407","doi":"10.14214/sf.411","title":"Stand dynamics modelling approaches for multicohort management of eastern Canadian boreal forests","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Silva Fennica","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"","keywords":"Forest management; Forest dynamics; Taiga; Boreal; Forest ecology; Disturbance (geology); Tree (set theory); Environmental resource management; Geography; Vegetation (pathology); Adaptive management; Ecology; Environmental science; Forestry; Ecosystem; Mathematics; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001912018,0.0001236603,0.0001367105,0.00004414226,0.0001170763,0.00001110687,0.0002552799,0.0000706658,0.00003800758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000002847191,0.0001214948,0.00006289853,0.00009267002,0.0001500334,0.00008883742,0.0001210294,0.00005944399,0.00004449419],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004534671,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002460326,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03075342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3699261,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989851,0.000008873192,0.0002023144,0.0002842124,0.0001389332,0.0003805684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995122,0.00001235358,0.00006104636,0.0002680501,0.000005215911,0.0001411511],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005901593,0.0001568026,0.04979134,0.0001151482,0.0001116671,0.00002186781,0.0002555393,0.8159464,6.793186e-7,0.1266443,0.0003362565,0.006560977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002055436,0.0002389794,0.2174745,0.00006347421,0.0001508806,0.000002957606,0.0005761106,0.7257007,0.00004025024,0.0485173,0.004749984,0.0004293874],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6211723,0.00008018814,0.2739431,0.0008032306,0.0002361317,0.001985156,0.00006569446,0.00004828137,0.1016659],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9849873,0.00002285023,0.01393746,0.00005013223,0.00001034453,0.00008729375,0.00003038576,0.00001587121,0.0008583359],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.363815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9757009,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02465836069492677,"score_gpt":0.2168549060756154,"score_spread":0.1921965453806887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}