{"id":"W1998458407","doi":"10.14214/sf.411","title":"Stand dynamics modelling approaches for multicohort management of eastern Canadian boreal forests","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Silva Fennica","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"","keywords":"Forest management; Forest dynamics; Taiga; Boreal; Forest ecology; Disturbance (geology); Tree (set theory); Environmental resource management; Geography; Vegetation (pathology); Adaptive management; Ecology; Environmental science; Forestry; Ecosystem; Mathematics; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007351075,0.0005777728,0.0003514084,0.0009039023,0.001294105,0.001801114,0.001852178,0.000768159,0.002726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001190653,0.000314097,0.0006464093,0.0009664421,0.0006054591,0.0008329077,0.0006742307,0.0006204862,0.0002009267],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009117492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00808571,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8589266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9060625,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997781,0.00004156786,0.00001515561,0.0000457359,0.00006466795,0.00005480709],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995795,0.00012641,0.00007338019,0.00002004296,0.0001457032,0.00005493229],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001005874,0.00001845557,0.006056691,0.00003204324,0.00003605213,0.00007107496,0.0001390838,0.965386,0.0003613638,0.01420378,0.001322284,0.01236313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003649413,0.000006594339,0.003400645,0.00001668895,0.00001472117,0.00002191919,0.0001275196,0.9857408,0.00007491386,0.00526975,0.005307134,0.00001563645],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3340598,0.004268439,0.5963104,0.003651451,0.0002574483,0.0003933462,0.005249781,0.0007784847,0.05503083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8815981,0.001915404,0.1022442,0.000222845,0.00005586164,0.0002179364,0.001179873,0.0001177164,0.0124479],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1410734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2838084,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02465836069492677,"score_gpt":0.2168549060756154,"score_spread":0.1921965453806887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}