{"id":"W1998570028","doi":"10.1109/icpr.2010.504","title":"Automatic Discrimination between Confusing Classes with Writing Styles Verification in Arabic Handwritten Numeral Recognition","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Handwritten Text Recognition Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Numeral system; Handwriting; Computer science; Word error rate; Linear discriminant analysis; Speech recognition; Writing style; Artificial intelligence; Arabic; Handwriting recognition; Pattern recognition (psychology); Arabic numerals; Style (visual arts); Natural language processing; Feature extraction; Linguistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001659794,0.0006086857,0.0006762845,0.0009815969,0.000472173,0.0007517618,0.0006854051,0.0006168531,0.000744353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00678502,0.0002258156,0.000342591,0.0005880048,0.000550815,0.001121938,0.0006940766,0.0006199559,0.0008769388],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001548862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003252206,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005684022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008744406,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974731,0.0008390473,0.0001799842,0.0004014781,0.0009449284,0.0001613923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956459,0.001491368,0.0007193025,0.0007363543,0.001209403,0.0001975442],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001193769,0.0002286528,0.008303876,0.0001219928,0.00004975479,0.0002826933,0.0003891429,0.003705846,0.3427958,0.0005028037,0.001074956,0.6413506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009788313,0.000689305,0.04520716,0.00003416853,0.0001045161,0.002107464,0.0003805965,0.3908494,0.5558852,0.001187675,0.003326472,0.0001302113],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.6296933,0.0005158269,0.3651755,0.0001300663,0.0001341501,0.0001153304,0.00008170078,0.001882391,0.00227177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8309142,0.0001294224,0.1669364,0.00005201567,0.00004162809,0.00004767426,0.0001415292,0.00009488431,0.001642185],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.001659794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008777916,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02362943470899868,"score_gpt":0.2675565636059991,"score_spread":0.2439271288970004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}